Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The mature minor doctrine is a rule of law found in the United States and Canada accepting that an unemancipated minor patient may possess the maturity to choose or reject a particular health care treatment, sometimes without the knowledge or agreement of parents, and should be permitted to do so. [1]
The Board is an independent quasi-judicial administrative tribunal that serves as an appeal body for recipients and providers of health services and others as provided for under The Health Services Insurance Act, The Emergency Response and Stretcher Transportation Act, and The Mental Health Act.
Prior to that date, there was a single superior court for Saskatchewan, known as the Supreme Court of Saskatchewan, which had both appellate and trial jurisdiction. Individual members of the Supreme Court sat as trial judges, while the full Supreme Court Court (also known at the Supreme Court en banc ) heard appeals.
The Saskatchewan Health Authority is the single health region of the province of Saskatchewan.It is a health authority providing direct and contracted health services including primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary care, home and community care, mental health services, population and preventive health and addictions services to the people of Saskatchewan.
[2] The Klassen and Kvello families were eventually paid $2.46 million by the Government of Saskatchewan in a 2004 damages agreement following a 2003 court case. [6] [7] Kathy and Michelle Ross received $560,000 from the Government of Saskatchewan in a lawsuit settlement related to the abuse they suffered while in foster care. [8]
There were two similar events around the same time where an allegation of child sex abuse escalated into claims of satanic ritual abuse. The more widely known of the two is the Martensville Daycare Scandal, and the second but earlier story is of the Foster Parent Scandal in nearby Saskatoon.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Ravndahl v Saskatchewan, 2009 SCC 7 (majority) Teck Cominco Metals Ltd v Lloyd's Underwriters, 2009 SCC 11 (majority) R v Craig, 2009 SCC 23, [2009] (concurrence) R v Ouellette, 2009 SCC 24 (dissent) AC v Manitoba (Director of Child and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30 (concurrence) R v Grant, 2009 SCC 32 (majority) R v Suberu, 2009 SCC 33 (majority)