enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regents_of_the_University...

    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke , 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a dispute over whether preferential treatment for minorities could reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution.

  3. Racial quota - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_quota

    In 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke that public universities (and other government institutions) could not set specific numerical targets based on race for admissions or employment. [5] The Court said that "goals" and "timetables" for diversity could be set instead. [5]

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) Racial quotas in educational institutions violate the Equal Protection Clause, but a more narrowly tailored use of race in admission decisions may be permissible. (Partially overruled by Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (2023)) Batson v.

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: 438 U.S. 265 (1978) Racial discrimination, affirmative action Lockett v. Ohio: 438 U.S. 586 (1978) Mitigating evidence required by the Eighth Amendment in capital sentencing proceedings FCC v. Pacifica Foundation: 438 U.S. 726 (1978) FCC policing of obscenity Rakas v. Illinois: 439 U.S. 128 (1978)

  6. Affirmative action heads to Supreme Court, years after UC ...

    www.aol.com/news/affirmative-action-heads...

    Need help? Call us! 800-290-4726 Login / Join. Mail

  7. Reverse discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_discrimination

    Elizabeth Purdy argues that this conception of reverse discrimination came close to overturning affirmative action during the conservative resurgence of the 1980s and '90s after being granted legitimacy by the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, which ruled that Alan Bakke had been discriminated ...

  8. 1996 California Proposition 209 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_California...

    On August 2, 2010, in a case brought before the Supreme Court of California by the Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) found for the second time that Proposition 209 was constitutional. [ 19 ] [ 20 ] The ruling, by a 6–1 majority, followed a unanimous affirmation in 2000 of the constitutionality of Prop. 209 by the same court.

  9. Supreme Court to issue separate rulings on affirmative action ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-issue-separate...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us