Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A coffee enema is the injection of coffee into the rectum and colon via the anus, i.e., as an enema.There is no scientific evidence to support any positive health claim for this practice, and medical authorities advise that the procedure may be dangerous.
Excessive use of enemas has also been associated with heart problems, such as heart failure, [13] as well as heart attacks related to electrolyte imbalances when performed as a coffee enema. [17] Frequent enemas or other colon-cleansing tools may lead to dependence and inability to defecate without assistance, as well as potential withdrawal ...
Gerson therapy includes administering enemas of coffee, [132] as well as of castor oil and sometimes of hydrogen peroxide or of ozone. [133] Some proponents of alternative medicine have claimed that coffee enemas have an anti-cancer effect by "detoxifying" metabolic products of tumors [122] but there is no medical scientific evidence to support ...
Coffee enemas are said to cause excretion of toxic breakdown products by the liver and through the colon wall. None of these ideas are supported by scientific research. [ 14 ] Gerson commented that his therapy aimed to create a "near normal condition of the oxidizing system in the body, to which malignant cells with the fermentation system ...
National Coffee Association President and CEO William Murray said banning European Method decaf coffee — the type that uses methylene chloride — “would defy science and harm American’s ...
Drinking more than four cups of caffeinated coffee in a day was associated with a lower risk for head and neck cancer, oral cavity cancer, and oropharyngeal cancers compared to not drinking coffee.
Around 36% of people in the study were morning coffee drinkers, 16% of people drank coffee throughout the day (morning, afternoon and evening) and 48% were not coffee drinkers, the researchers said.
The scientific consensus is coffee enemas are unproven, rash and potentially dangerous. - Sum mer PhD ( talk ) 23:14, 14 January 2015 (UTC) [ reply ] Thank you but cherry picking the worst data to support a view, highlighting the extremes and associating other negative effects from dirty equipment etc (guilt by association) is just not science ...