enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Royal Canin U. S. A., Inc. v. Wullschleger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Canin_U._S._A.,_Inc...

    Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger, 604 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court affirmed the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, ordering that after a deletion of all federal claims deprived the District Court of federal-question jurisdiction, the suit became one for a state court.

  3. Roake v. Brumley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roake_v._Brumley

    Roake v. Brumley is a United States federal court case regarding Louisiana House Bill 71, which will require the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in all public classrooms in Louisiana.

  4. E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E.M.D._Sales,_Inc._v._Carrera

    E.M.D. Sales, Inc. v. Carrera, 604 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a preponderance of the evidence standard applies when an employer seeks to show that an employee is exempt from the minimum-wage and overtimepay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

  5. Barton v. Barr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barton_v._Barr

    Barton v. Barr, 590 U.S. 222 (2020) is a Supreme Court of the United States ruling which upheld a decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals that permanent residents (green card holders) rendered "inadmissible" for some crimes committed under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(2) within the initial seven years of continuous residence were ineligible for 8 U.S.C. § 1229b cancellation of removal relief.

  6. Anti-Injunction Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Injunction_Act

    The Tax Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1341, prevents federal district courts from "enjoin[ing], suspend[ing] or restrain[ing] the assessment, levy or collection of any tax under State law where a plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State."

  7. Patsone v. Pennsylvania - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patsone_v._Pennsylvania

    Patsone v. Pennsylvania, 232 U.S. 138 (1914) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Pennsylvania’s Act of May 8, 1909, deeming it unlawful for "unnaturalized foreign born residents" to kill wild animals, except for when defending their property or person and only by means of a pistol; the Pennsylvania statue barred unnaturalized foreign born residents from possession of shotguns or rifles ...

  8. Shaw v. Hunt - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaw_v._Hunt

    Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning redistricting and racial gerrymandering. This case and its predecessor, Shaw v.Reno, concerned North Carolina's congressional redistricting plans.