Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The common law of South Africa, "an amalgam of principles drawn from Roman, Roman-Dutch, English and other jurisdictions, which were accepted and applied by the courts in colonial times and during the period that followed British rule after Union in 1910," [76] plays virtually no role in collective labour law. Initially, in fact, employment law ...
Kylie v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others is an important decision in South African labour law, handed down on 26 May 2010 in the Labour Appeal Court of South Africa.
Saambou-Nasionale Bouvereniging v Friedman 1979 (3) SA 978 (AD), sometimes called Saambou v Friedman, [1] was a landmark decision in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa, with crucial implications for contract in that country, as Jansen JA accepted the reliance theory into South African law, citing Smith v Hughes.
Labour Court of South Africa cases (6 P) Pages in category "South African labour case law" The following 21 pages are in this category, out of 21 total.
Pages in category "2007 in South African case law" The following 16 pages are in this category, out of 16 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. A.
African Guarantee & Indemnity Co Ltd v Minister of Justice 1959 (2) SA 437 (A). Bezuidenhout NO v Eskom 2003 (3) SA 83 (SCA). Commissioner, South African Revenue Service, and Another v TFN Diamond Cutting Works (Pty) Ltd 2005 (5) SA 113 (SCA). Ess Kay Electronics Pte Ltd and Another v First National Bank of Southern Africa Ltd 2001 (1) SA 1214 ...
Smit v Abrahams [1] is an important case in South African law.It was heard in the Appellate Division on March 15, 1994, with judgment handed down on May 16. Botha AR, EM Grosskopf AR, Kumleben AR, Van Den Heever AR and Mahomed Wn AR were the judges.
Alfred McAlpine & Son (Pty) Ltd v Transvaal Provincial Administration [1] is an important case in the South African law of contract, heard in the Appellate Division from 18 to 21 February 1974, and decided on 20 May. The case concerned a contract to build a portion of a national road, into which contract an exceptional number of variations was ...