enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Committee of Advertising Practice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_of_Advertising...

    The CAP, alongside ASA, is primarily responsible for the constant revising and updating of the UK Code of Non-Broadcast Advertising, Direct Marketing, and Sales Promotion . [ 3 ] [ 4 ] CAP also provides training and advice for advertisers to help them understand the Code, [ 5 ] including offering free advice to companies on whether their ad ...

  3. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2009) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Fox_Television...

    However, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in the case Fox et al. v. Federal Communications Commission (06-1760 Archived February 10, 2009, at the Wayback Machine) that the FCC cannot punish broadcast stations for such incidents. [6] On the week of March 17, 2008, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear this ...

  4. Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Ass'n v. FCC

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_Broadcasting...

    Congress required satellite television carriers to carry all requesting local broadcast stations in the market where the carrier voluntarily decides to carry one local station in order to, in part, preserve a multiplicity of local broadcast outlets for over-the-air-viewers who do not subscribe either to satellite or cable service.

  5. National Broadcasting Co. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Broadcasting_Co...

    National Broadcasting Co. v. United States, 319 U.S. 190 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Communications Commission had the power to issue regulations pertaining to associations between broadcasting networks and their affiliated stations, otherwise known as "chain networks."

  6. FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Fox_Television...

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled in the initial case ([6]) that the FCC cannot punish broadcast stations for such incidents. [7] The FCC appealed to the Supreme Court, [8] and in the 2009 case, the Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, [9] finding that the new policy was not arbitrary. However, the issue of ...

  7. Broadcast Decency Enforcement Act of 2005 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_Decency...

    Specifically, it is a violation of federal law to broadcast obscene, indecent or profane programming. Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1464 prohibits the utterance of any 'obscene, indecent or profane language by means of radio communication.'" [ 6 ] The range of the FCC's authority over censorship for inappropriate conduct on the ...

  8. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_Broadcasting_System...

    Under a less demanding intermediate scrutiny analysis for non-content-based regulations, the District Court held that the preservation of local broadcasting was an important governmental interest, and that the must-carry provisions were acceptably tailored to serve that interest. [5] Turner Broadcasting System appealed that decision.

  9. FCC v. Prometheus Radio Project - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_v._Prometheus_Radio...

    Federal Communications Commission v. Prometheus Radio Project, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with media ownership rules that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) can set under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.