Ad
related to: zinsco circuit breaker patentebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
- Under $10
Fun Stuff. Ships Free.
Brand New. Guilt Free.
- Toys
Come Out and Play.
Make Playtime a Celebration!
- Gift Cards
eBay Gift Cards to the Rescue.
Give The Gift You Know They’ll Love
- Trending on eBay
Inspired by Trending Stories.
Find Out What's Hot and New on eBay
- Under $10
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Almost immediately, Zinsco began development of new panel and circuit breaker designs, with patent applications dating back to 1946. The first Zinsco panels contained copper bus-bars and copper breaker clips. Original breakers were patented in 1950 and labeled “Magnatrip.” Five additional patents would be issued for subsequent designs.
The "Stab-Lok” circuit breaker and panel produced by Federal Pacific Electric (FPE) installed in hundreds of thousands of homes in the Bay Area may cause house fires, according decades of documentation and electrical experts interviewed by the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit.
This is a list of notable patent law cases in the United States in chronological order. The cases have been decided notably by the United States Supreme Court , the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) or the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI).
On October 6, 1999, LizardTech filed suit against ERM in the Western District of Washington Court alleging infringement of claims 1, 13, 22–25, 27 and 28 of the '835 patent, among other charges. [5] ERM filed a motion for summary judgement of non-infringement, arguing that a row of pixels is not a tile as defined by the patent. On December 12 ...
Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 563 U.S. 776 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that title in a patented invention vests first in the inventor, even if the inventor is a researcher at a federally funded lab subject to the 1980 Bayh–Dole Act. [1]
Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005), [1] was a case decided by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit en banc, that clarified the hierarchy of evidentiary sources usable for claim construction in patent law. [2]
In 1867, he petitioned the United States Congress for a retrospective patent on his inventions of the late 1830s: the spiral conductor, the circuit breakers, the double helical coil. [78] The granting of such a patent transgressed such policies as that an invention in widespread public use for decades can not be patented, and that an employee ...
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified the nonobviousness requirement in United States patent law, [1] set forth 14 years earlier in Patent Act of 1952 and codified as 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Ad
related to: zinsco circuit breaker patentebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month