Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia article traffic statistics – a tool for charting how many hits any given article gets, great for comparing different kinds of articles at different times, e.g., Genetics (in the school year) vs. (in the summer), or YouTube (with weekend spikes) and Simpsons (with spikes when new episodes come out). Students can also use it to see ...
This page contains short guides and advice for reviewing various types of articles as part of new pages patrol.Where the main instructions page focuses on a mechanical view of how to process an article, this page summarizes key things to look out for on specific types of articles, as well as resources and likely outcomes.
Featured articles comprise 6,665 out of a total of 6,941,004 articles on the English Wikipedia (about 0.1% or one out of every 1,040 articles). Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at featured article review.
Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Wikipedia:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here). 2. Featured article ...
Reviewing new articles; Peer review, a process for receiving ideas and feedback from other editors about articles; Featured article review and Good article reassessment, information about reviewing Featured Articles and Good Articles to see if they still qualify for that status; Specific user groups which mention reviewing include: Pending ...
A trip through the history of an article, from humble beginnings to Good Article status (6m 25s) Places for general Wikipedia help For most kinds of help on Wikipedia—technical questions; policies and guidelines; etiquette; conflicts with editors; feedback and reviews of your work—the first place your students should turn is the "Discussion ...
The review should not be influenced by beliefs about how the article could be made "perfect", by how the reviewer would have written the article, or by personal feelings about the article topic. [2] Reviewers should aim to advise on content and form rather than to impose their preferences.
Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor.