enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Vicarious liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability

    Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine of agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability, or duty to control" the activities of a violator.

  3. Vicarious liability (criminal) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_(criminal)

    The general rule in criminal law is that there is no vicarious liability. This reflects the general principle that crime is composed of both an actus reus (the Latin tag for "guilty act") and a mens rea (the Latin tag for "guilty mind") and that a person should only be convicted if they are directly responsible for causing both elements to occur at the same time (see concurrence).

  4. Vicarious liability in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicarious_liability_in...

    Vicarious liability in English law is a doctrine of English tort law that imposes strict liability on employers for the wrongdoings of their employees. Generally, an employer will be held liable for any tort committed while an employee is conducting their duties. [ 1 ]

  5. Respondeat superior - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Respondeat_superior

    This rule is also called the master-servant rule, recognized in both common law and civil law jurisdictions. [ 3 ] In a broader scope, respondeat superior is based upon the concept of vicarious liability .

  6. Secondary liability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secondary_liability

    The concept of vicarious liability was developed in the Second Circuit as an extension of the common law doctrine of agency – respondeat superior (the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate). Pursuant to this doctrine, courts recognized that employers should be liable for the infringing acts of their employees under ...

  7. Frolic and detour - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frolic_and_detour

    Frolic and detour in the law of torts occur when an employee (or agent) makes a physical departure from the service of his employer (or principal).A detour occurs when an employee or agent makes a minor departure from his employer's charge whereas a frolic is a major departure when the employee is acting on his own and for his own benefit, rather than a minor sidetrack in the course of obeying ...

  8. Qui facit per alium facit per se - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_facit_per_alium_facit...

    Qui facit per alium facit per se (anglicised Late Latin), [1] which means "He who acts through another does the act himself", is a fundamental legal maxim of the law of agency. [2] It is a maxim often stated in discussing the liability of employer for the act of employee in terms of vicarious liability." [3]

  9. Solidary obligations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solidary_obligations

    A common example of a solidary obligation created thorough operation of law is vicarious liability such as respondeat superior. Solidarity can be either active or passive. A solidary obligation that is active exists among the obligees (creditors) in the transaction. It is passive when it exists among the obligors (debtors) in a transaction.