enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gold Clause Cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_Clause_Cases

    Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. with United States v.Bankers Trust Co. 294 U.S. 240 (1935): The bearer of a $22.50 bond coupon of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad demanded payment of $38.10, the value of the coupon's gold obligation based on the statutory price of gold.

  3. Katzenbach v. McClung - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katzenbach_v._McClung

    Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court which unanimously held that Congress acted within its power under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution in forbidding racial discrimination in restaurants as this was a burden to interstate commerce.

  4. McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCabe_v._Atchison,_Topeka...

    McCabe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company, 235 U.S. 151 (1914), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that an Oklahoma law was unconstitutional insofar as it did not provide dining cars and other luxury accommodations for African-American passengers, however the Court also ruled that the litigants were not entitled to equitable relief because they lacked ...

  5. Gold clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_clause

    Congress later rendered gold clauses again enforceable for contracts issued after October 28, 1977, as codified in 31 U.S.C. § 5118(d)(2). In 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the enforceability of such clauses in the decision 216 Jamaica Avenue, LLC vs S&R Playhouse Realty Co.. [2]

  6. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGoldrick_v._Berwind...

    McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co., 309 U.S. 33 (1940), is United States Supreme Court case upholding the legality under the Constitution's Commerce Clause of a tax by the City of New York upon the purchase of coal by public utility and steamship companies based in New York from Berwind-White Coal Mining Company, a Pennsylvania coal company through its New York office.

  7. City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Richmond_v._J.A...

    City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the minority set-aside program of Richmond, Virginia, which gave preference to minority business enterprises (MBE) in the awarding of municipal contracts, was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. The Court found ...

  8. Cooley v. Board of Wardens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooley_v._Board_of_Wardens

    Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 53 U.S. (12 How.) 299 (1852), was a US Supreme Court case that held that a Pennsylvania law requiring all ships entering or leaving Philadelphia to hire a local pilot did not violate the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution.

  9. Coppage v. Kansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coppage_v._Kansas

    Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915), was a Supreme Court of the United States case based on United States labor law that allowed employers to implement contracts—called yellow-dog contracts—which forbade employees from joining unions.