enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Lotka–Volterra equations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotka–Volterra_equations

    Both the Lotka–Volterra and Rosenzweig–MacArthur models have been used to explain the dynamics of natural populations of predators and prey. In the late 1980s, an alternative to the Lotka–Volterra predatorprey model (and its common-prey-dependent generalizations) emerged, the ratio dependent or Arditi–Ginzburg model. [22]

  3. Arditi–Ginzburg equations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arditi–Ginzburg_equations

    Predators receive a reproductive payoff, e, for consuming prey, and die at rate u. Making predation pressure a function of the ratio of prey to predators contrasts with the prey-dependent Lotka–Volterra equations, where the per capita effect of predators on the prey population is simply a function of the magnitude of the prey population g(N).

  4. Intraguild predation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraguild_predation

    Intraguild predation is common in nature and widespread across communities and ecosystems. [2] Intraguild predators must share at least one prey species and usually occupy the same trophic guild, and the degree of IGP depends on factors such as the size, growth, and population density of the predators, as well as the population density and behavior of their shared prey. [1]

  5. Numerical response - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numerical_response

    a = conversion efficiency: the fraction of prey energy assimilated by the predator and turned into new predators P = predator density V = prey density m = predator mortality c = capture rate Demographic response consists of a change in dP/dt due to a change in V and/or m. For example, if V increases, then predator growth rate (dP/dt) will increase.

  6. Exploitative interactions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploitative_interactions

    For example, exploitative interactions between a predator and prey can result in the extinction of the victim (the prey, in this case), as the predator, by definition, kills the prey, and thus reduces its population. [2] Another effect of these interactions is in the coevolutionary "hot" and "cold spots" put forth by geographic mosaic theory ...

  7. Huffaker's mite experiment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huffaker's_mite_experiment

    The aim of Huffaker’s 1958 experiment was to “shed light upon the fundamental nature of predatorprey interaction” [2] and to “establish an ecosystem in which a predatory and a prey species could continue living together so that the phenomena associated with their interactions could be studied in detail”. [3]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Consumer–resource interactions - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consumer–resource...

    Consumer–resource interactions are the core motif of ecological food chains or food webs, [1] and are an umbrella term for a variety of more specialized types of biological species interactions including prey-predator (see predation), host-parasite (see parasitism), plant-herbivore and victim-exploiter systems.