Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The case is Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-04792. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Kirsten Donovan)
Anyone who wants a cut of Oracle's $115 million proposed settlement agreement must submit a claim by or before a looming deadline. ... Katz-Lacabe et al v. Oracle America, Inc.c/o Settlement ...
The dispute centered on the use of parts of the Java programming language's application programming interfaces (APIs) and about 11,000 lines of source code, which are owned by Oracle (through subsidiary, Oracle America, Inc., originating from Sun Microsystems), within early versions of the Android operating system by Google.
We never ask for personal info, such as credit card numbers or passwords, in emails. However, from time to time, we'll ask you to update your recovery info after signing in. You'll also get a notification titled “Your AOL account information has changed” if any info in your account settings are updated.
Oracle was required to prove that the two parties would have agreed on the hypothetical license and license fees, but Oracle had no such evidence. Oracle did not provide facts on previous licensing history or practices. Oracle also failed to provide evidence on benchmark licenses, such as negotiated licenses for comparable works.
The Court cited three prior Supreme Court cases limiting awards to those specified by Congress: Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc. (1987), West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey (1991), and Arlington Central School District Board of Education v.
(Bloomberg) -- When the Internet Accountability Project popped up late last year and joined the growing crusade against Big Tech, the nonprofit group refused to say who was financing it.Turns out ...
Google v. Oracle has absolutely no bearing. The claim that Micro Focus is "the owner of Unix" is based on a court judgement against SCO that references "the older Unix software". By this, they mean the System V source code. This is a completely separate, irrelevant, now long settled issue.