Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Title II and the amendments made by the title originally would have ceased to have effect on December 31, 2005, with the exception of the below sections. However, on December 22, 2005, the sunset clause expiration date was extended to February 3, 2006, and then on February 2, 2006 it was further extended to March 2010. [1]
This title has 25 sections, with one of the sections (section 224) containing a sunset clause which sets an expiration date, of 31 December 2005, for most of the title's provisions. On 22 December 2005, the sunset clause expiration date was extended to 3 February 2006. Title II contains many of the most contentious provisions of the act.
In public policy, a sunset provision or sunset clause is a measure within a statute, regulation or other law that provides for the law to cease to be effective after a specified date, unless further legislative action is taken to extend it. Unlike most laws that remain in force indefinitely unless they are amended or repealed, sunset provisions ...
Clauses limiting the duration of such laws are often called "sunset" clauses. [ 1 ] Temporary laws are commonly given temporal validity by the inclusion of an expiration date at which the law ceases to be in effect unless it is extended.
But the Umstead Coalition says the inclusion of a sunset clause in the final permit was intentional. State regulators and politicians opposed a quarry next to the park, it says, and the clause was ...
The Umstead Coalition sued the Department of Environmental Quality for changing a single word from Wake Stone Corp.’s permit to mine next to Umstead State Park.
Short title and commencement: This Act may be called the Constitution (Twenty First Amendment) Act, 2015. It shall come into force at once. The provisions of this Amendment Act shall remain in force for a period of two years from the date of its commencement and shall cease to form part of the Constitution and shall stand repealed on the expiration of the said period.
The federal judiciary clarified last year that the rules require jurists to disclose non-business stays at resorts and the use of private jets. In response to the outcry over the Thomas trips, ...