Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The WP:MASSCREATION of articles that uses any sort of automation requires community approval. Mass creation of articles generally can result in disruptions. The order of the top 100 editors has thus been scrambled in order to discourage mass creation by competitive users who seek a high rank, such as to become the #1 Wikipedia editor.
List divided into the most list articles: United States National Register of Historic Places listings as of 29 March 2024) Articles with the most references that is a list: 2023 deaths in the United States (2,090 references as of 20 December 2024)
The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Wikipedia}} banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Wikipedia articles by quality and Category:Wikipedia articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.
Many featured articles were previously good articles (which are reviewed with a less restrictive set of criteria). There are 6,646 featured articles out of 6,934,393 articles on the English Wikipedia (about 0.1% or one out of every 1,040 articles).
Wikipedia:Article assessment (historical), the previous version superseded by this version; Wikipedia:Assessing articles, an essay on the criteria and purpose of article assessments; Wikipedia:Metadata gadget, a script (and gadget) that finds articles' assessment information from the talk page and puts it in the article's header
This page was developed by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography as a list of the most important biographies in Wikipedia, to have a work list of articles to improve. Any such list is subjective and will not find universal agreement. This was used as a worklist for the Version 1.0 Editorial Team.
Vital articles is a list of subjects for which Wikipedia should have corresponding high-quality articles. It serves as a centralized watchlist to track the status of Wikipedia's m
Wikipedia has its own article titles policy and manual of style, geared toward making the encyclopedia as reader-friendly as possible to a broad, general audience, without dumbing down content. These Wikipedia-internal best practices are a careful balance of compromises, and they generally do not match in every detail what is preferred in any ...