Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Tellabs Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, 551 U.S. 308 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled on the interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995's requirement of scienter in a civil action in apply to Tellabs and Makor Issues & Rights. [1]
Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. 551 U.S. 308 (2007) The proper standard for determining whether a plaintiff has alleged a "strong inference" of scienter under the PSLRA: Morse v. Frederick: 551 U.S. 393 (2007) free speech rights of high school students ("Bong Hits 4 Jesus") CBOCS West v. Humphries: 551 U.S. 442 (2008)
Tellabs, Inc. is a global network technology company that provides networking and communications solutions to both private and governmental agencies. [2] The company offers a range of products and services, including optical transport systems, access systems, managed access solutions, and network management software.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
He coined the term "Decision Analysis" in a paper in 1966, kickstarting the field. [3] He was a founding Director and Chairman of Strategic Decisions Group. [ 4 ] Interests included improving the quality of decisions, life-and-death decision-making, and the creation of a coercion-free society. [ 5 ]
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure. Authored by Justice David Souter , it established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, is insufficient to sustain an antitrust action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act .
On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...
Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum Co. , 493 A.2d 946 (Del. 1985) [ 1 ] is a landmark decision of the Delaware Supreme Court on corporate defensive tactics against take-over bids. Until the Unocal decision in 1985, the Delaware courts had applied the business judgment rule , when appropriate, to takeover defenses, mergers, and sales.