Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito declined to recuse himself from this case and former president Trump’s presidential immunity case tied to Jan. 6 after Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin called on ...
The small mountain city of Grants Pass, Oregon, which last year brought the legal fight over public sleeping bans to the Supreme Court, has strengthened its homeless resources over the past seven ...
Los Angeles-based attorney Theane Evangelis, representing the Oregon city, said the problem of homelessness has been made worse in the West because of U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rulings ...
See the full text transcript of Donald Trump's inaugural address after being sworn in as the 47th president of the United States.
In June 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government is allowed to communicate with social media companies about content moderation policies and the removal of misinformation on social media sites. [2] [3] EO 14149 was signed with 25 other executive orders on the first day of Trump's second presidency. [4]
Martin v. Boise (full case name Robert Martin, Lawrence Lee Smith, Robert Anderson, Janet F. Bell, Pamela S. Hawkes, and Basil E. Humphrey v.City of Boise) was a 2018 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding anti-camping ordinances targeting homeless people, effectively overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024.
While Gov. Newsom and others welcomed the Supreme Court ruling on homeless camps, the controversial topic has divided more moderate Democrats from progressives.