Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The list given here is far from exhaustive, and contains the most influential, currently publishing journals in each field. As a rule of thumb, each field should be represented by at most ten positions, chosen by their impact factors and other ratings.
The following is a partial list of scientific journals. There are thousands of scientific journals in publication, and many more have been published at various points in the past. The list given here is far from exhaustive, only containing some of the most influential, currently publishing journals in each field.
The following is a partial list of lists of academic journals. Lists of journals. By topic. List of academic journals about specific authors; List of accounting ...
Journal Citation Reports (JCR) is an annual publication by Clarivate. [1] It has been integrated with the Web of Science and is accessed from the Web of Science Core Collection. It provides information about academic journals in the natural and social sciences, including impact factors. JCR was originally published as a part of the Science ...
Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. [ 12 ] [ 13 ] The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero.
List of bioinformatics journals. 3 languages. ... This is a list of notable peer-reviewed scientific journals that focus on bioinformatics and computational biology.
The following journals are considered open access: Bayesian Analysis; Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics; Chilean Journal of Statistics; Electronic Journal of Statistics; Journal of Official Statistics; Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods; Journal of Statistical Software; Journal of Statistics Education
Scopus is a scientific abstract and citation database, launched by the academic publisher Elsevier as a competitor to older Web of Science in 2004. [1] An ensuing competition between the two databases has been characterized as "intense" and is considered to significantly benefit their users in terms of continuous improvent in coverage, search/analysis capabilities, but not in price.