Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation , 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit .
Costello v. United States, 390 U.S. 201 (1968) (per curiam) Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968) (per curiam) Forgett v. United States, 390 U.S. 203 (1968) (per curiam) Ortega v. Michigan, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Stone v. United States, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Anderson v. Georgia, 390 U.S. 206 (1968) (per curiam) SEC ...
Microsoft Corp. v. United States, known on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as United States v. Microsoft Corp., 584 U.S. ___, 138 S. Ct. 1186 (2018), was a data privacy case involving the extraterritoriality of law enforcement seeking electronic data under the 1986 Stored Communications Act (SCA), Title II of the Electronic Communications ...
Developed by Parroty Interactive, the self-professed National Lampoon of the interactive media industry, Microshaft Winblows 98 became the company's fourth interactive comedy video game, after Pyst which is a clone of adventure video game Myst, Star Warped which is a satire of science-fiction film series Star Wars, and The X-Fools, a spoof of ...
0–9. 1999 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States; 2000 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
Nintendo's (NTDOY) Reggie Fils-Aime -- the Japanese gaming giant's Nintendo of America president -- revealed on Monday that it sold 400,000 Wii U consoles since the system's launch last
The designation is stated at the beginning of the opinion. Single-line per curiam decisions are also issued without concurrence or dissent by a hung Supreme Court (a 4–4 decision), when the Court has a vacant seat. The notable exceptions to the usual characteristics for a per curiam decision are the cases of New York Times Co. v. United ...
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices frequently join multiple opinions in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.