enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Open source license litigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source_license_litigation

    Following Jacobsen v Katzer, Artifex Software Inc v Hancom Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California centered on breaches of open source software licenses, including breaches of contract as well as infringements of copyright. Artifex is the exclusive licensor of the software product, Ghostscript, under the ...

  3. Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broderbund_Software_Inc._v...

    Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc., 648 F. Supp. 1127, 1133 (N.D. Cal. 1986), was a United States District Court for the Northern District of California software case, initially important in determining how U.S. copyright law applied to the look and feel presented by a software product. It took an expansive position which later ...

  4. High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-Tech_Employee...

    In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509 [10]) is a class-action lawsuit on behalf of over 64,000 employees of Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm (the last two are subsidiaries of Disney) against their employer alleging that their wages were ...

  5. California Court Case Management System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Court_Case...

    Five Superior Courts—in Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, and Ventura Counties—use CCMS version 3 to process civil cases. This represents approximately 25 percent of the civil case volume in California. [3] Fresno is the only Superior Court still using version 2 of CCMS.

  6. ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProCD,_Inc._v._Zeidenberg

    ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir., 1996), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [1] The case is a significant precedent on the matter of the applicability of American contract law to new types of shrinkwrap licenses that arose with home computing and the Internet in the 1990s, and whether such licenses are enforceable contracts.

  7. AOL

    search.aol.com

    The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    1) ASCAP members have a common and undivided interest in the right to license in association through the Society free of the state statute. 2) The lower court should have allowed ASCAP members the opportunity to price the cost of complying with the statute and the value of the copyrights affected by it. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp.