Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The National Association of Convenience Stores, also known as the NACS, complained that this measure "merely make[s] retailers the collection agents for the banks." [14] The National Retail Federation said, "that card company fees are the problem and the surcharge story is a volume that belongs on the fiction aisles. The real threat to ...
The National Credit Corporation was an independent agency of the United States federal government established in 1931 to stem the tide of bank failures across the US. [1] The corporation served as an intermediary in the interbank lending market , loaning funds from its $500,000,000 banker's pool to banks on the verge of failure.
Congress in 1996 expanded the law to permit lawsuits against "persons" that give credit information to credit reporting agencies. Nandan Joshi, Kirtz's lawyer, on Monday urged the justices to find ...
The Court affirmed First National Bank and Trust Company v.National Credit Union Administration [4] which had remanded the case to the district court. This meant that, without legislation changing the language of the statute, a broad order could have been issued enjoining the admission of members to any federal occupational credit union who did not share the original single common bond of ...
Credit Acceptance (CACC) agrees to pay $27.2 million to settle the lawsuit filed by the Massachusetts Attorney General in August 2020 claiming that the company deceived auto-lending practices.
National Organization for Women v. Scheidler: anti-abortion activities: Supreme Court of the United States: 1994 Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation: price fixing and other allegedly anti-competitive trade practices in the credit card industry: 2012 Pigford v. Glickman
Comerica Bank faces lawsuit, accused of illegal fees, harming Direct Express cardholders. Susan Tompor. December 11, 2024 at 3:21 PM.
Marquette Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978), is a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that state anti-usury laws regulating interest rates cannot be enforced against nationally chartered banks based in other states.