enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Electronic Federal Tax Payment System - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Federal_Tax...

   A Forbes article about EFTPS recommends using the service to make estimated tax payments, noting that one can schedule payments in advance but also modify the payments in case of some unexpected changes to plans. The article also notes the importance of planning in advance the first year one intends to use the service: "The first year you sign ...

3. Tax Refund Loans: How To Get an Advance in 2025 - AOL

   www.aol.com/tax-refund-loans-advance-2023...

   Tax Preparation Company. Loan Amount. Fees and Interest. Intuit TurboTax. Up to 50% of your anticipated refund. None. H&R Block – Emerald Advance: up to $1,300

4. TurboTax Review 2022: The Pros, Cons and What You Need to Know

   www.aol.com/turbotax-review-know-online-tax...

   TurboTax Live: Free to $169, depending on tier; free to $259 for Full Service. If you owe taxes after you file, you can pay through TurboTax’s payment processor via credit card or debit card for ...

5. What you need to know before getting a tax refund advance - AOL

   www.aol.com/know-getting-tax-refund-advance...

   If you applied for a $2,500 loan under the Go Big Refund Advance program and incurred a 2.5% fee, you would in effect pay $2,563 back on the loan. The interest you’ll often see quoted is ...

6. Refund anticipation loan - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refund_anticipation_loan

   Refund advance loans began in 1985 when Ronald Smith, an accountant in Virginia Beach, VA started the practice of at his accounting firm, Action Accounting & Taxes. This service of loans-on-tax-refunds was advertised in the local area between 1985 and 1987.

7. Advance payment - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advance_payment

   Advance payments made as a loan are generally repayable but this is not always the case. In Leibson Corporation and Others v TOC Investments Corporation and Others, an English Court of Appeal case in 2018, [3] it was established following principles of contractual interpretation that, in the absence of any specific language to the contrary, an "advance" is not always repayable.