Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Muni arb is a relative value strategy that seizes upon an inefficiency that is related to government tax policy; interest on municipal bonds is exempt from federal income tax. [1] [2] Because the source of this arbitrage is artificially imposed by government regulation, it has persisted (i.e., it has not been "arbed away") for decades. [3]
Additionally, private activity bonds, a type of municipal bond, are typically exempt from federal taxes but some are subject to tax under the alternative minimum system tax. De minimis tax rule ...
Tax-exempt securities represented about 80% of trading volume in U.S. municipal bonds in 2020. [13] Interest income from most municipal bonds is excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes, and may be exempt from state income tax as well, depending on the applicable state laws. [14] Internal Revenue Code section 103(a) is the ...
Build America Bonds are taxable municipal bonds that carry special tax credits and federal subsidies for either the bond issuer or the bondholder. Build America Bonds were created under Section 1531 of Title I of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act that U.S. President Barack Obama signed into law on February 17, 2009.
The same 3 percent muni bond now has a tax-equivalent yield of 5 percent. In general, a taxable bond would need to pay more than 5 percent before you’d earn more after-tax than with the 3 ...
Named after its legislative sponsors, the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act (California Government Code §6584-6599.1) is a law enacted by the California Legislature in 1985. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The main purpose of this statute is to allow local California governments to work together to get financing in a way that will conceivably lower borrowing costs.
The bonds in this fund are generally exempt from federal income taxes, which is why the stated yield is lower than taxable funds. Yield: 4.27 percent Expense ratio: 0.32 percent
The IRS sent three "Notices of Proposed Issues" in January 2009, challenging the tax-exempt status of the bonds on three grounds: the Issuer does not qualify as a political subdivision or "on behalf of the issuer" of tax-exempt bonds pursuant to Section 1.103-I(b) of the Internal Revenue Code regulations,