Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An asymmetric relation need not have the connex property. For example, the strict subset relation is asymmetric, and neither of the sets {,} and {,} is a strict subset of the other. A relation is connex if and only if its complement is asymmetric.
In mathematics, a binary relation on a set is antisymmetric if there is no pair of distinct elements of each of which is related by to the other. More formally, is antisymmetric precisely if for all ,,, or equivalently, =.
A relation is asymmetric if and only if it is both antisymmetric and irreflexive. [12] For example, > is an asymmetric relation, but ≥ is not. Again, the previous 3 alternatives are far from being exhaustive; as an example over the natural numbers, the relation xRy defined by x > 2 is neither symmetric (e.g. 5 R 1 , but not 1 R 5 ) nor ...
An asymmetric relation is a binary relation defined on a set of elements such that if holds for elements and , then must be false. Stated differently, an asymmetric relation is characterized by a necessary absence of symmetry of the relation in the opposite direction.
¯ is asymmetric, where U {\displaystyle U} is the universal relation and R ⊤ {\displaystyle R^{\top }} is the converse relation of R . {\displaystyle R.} The following are equivalent: [ 14 ]
By definition, a nonempty relation cannot be both symmetric and asymmetric (where if a is related to b, then b cannot be related to a (in the same way)). However, a relation can be neither symmetric nor asymmetric, which is the case for "is less than or equal to" and "preys on").
A transitive relation is asymmetric if and only if it is irreflexive. [6] A transitive relation need not be reflexive. When it is, it is called a preorder.
A strict total order is a relation that is irreflexive, asymmetric, transitive and connected. An equivalence relation is a relation that is reflexive, symmetric, ...