Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Text of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk. The Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 ( c 47 ), usually called "TLATA" or "TOLATA", is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, which altered the law in relation to ...
Mortgage Corporation v Shaire [2001] Ch 743 [1] is a widely reported English land law case relating to the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996.Such a status specifically flowed from an instance of non est factum mortgage fraud where the mortgage lender and the defrauded co-owner wished to accelerate and delay sale respectively.
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996: Image title: Author: www.legislation.gov.uk: Software used: FOP 1.0: Conversion program: Apache FOP Version 2.1: Encrypted: no: Page size: 595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4) Version of PDF format: 1.4
Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (c. 47) The primary aim of the Settled Land Acts 1882 to 1890 was, as Lord Halsbury stated in Bruce v. Ailesbury, [1] "to release the land from the fetters of the settlement – to render it a marketable article not withstanding the settlement".
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 is a decision by the UK Supreme Court concerning the beneficial entitlement to a co-owned family home under a constructive trust.The court ruled there was a 90:10 split of ownership in favour of the main child-caring partner who contributed 80% of the equity to the home in which she lived.
The modern law's sources derive from the old courts of common law and equity, and legislation such as the Law of Property Act 1925, the Settled Land Act 1925, the Land Charges Act 1972, the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and the Land Registration Act 2002. At its core, English land law involves the acquisition, content and ...
ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir., 1996), was a court ruling at the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. [1] The case is a significant precedent on the matter of the applicability of American contract law to new types of shrinkwrap licenses that arose with home computing and the Internet in the 1990s, and whether such licenses are enforceable contracts.
(1) Title to property passes both at law and in equity even if the transfer is made for an illegal purpose. The fact that title has passed to the transferee does not preclude the transferor from bringing an action for restitution. (2) The transferor's action will fail if it would be illegal for him to retain any interest in the property