enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    The amendment was proposed in response to the implications presented in the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010), a U.S. constitutional law case concerning the regulation of independent political expenditures by corporations, which the nonprofit organization Citizens United challenged on the ...

  4. Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bipartisan_Campaign_Reform_Act

    In March 2009, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, regarding whether or not a political documentary about Hillary Clinton could be considered a political ad that must be paid for with funds regulated under the Federal Election Campaign Act. [18]

  5. Opinion - Mitch McConnell’s lamentable legacy - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-mitch-mcconnell...

    And he played a pivotal role in court challenges that resulted in Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision that paved the way for virtually unlimited and often undisclosed ...

  6. Citizens United v. FEC - en.wikipedia.org

    en.wikipedia.org/api/rest_v1/page/mobile-html/...

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  7. Moneyocracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moneyocracy

    Moneyocracy is a 2012 documentary film about Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission , 558 U.S. 310 (2010), which was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment prohibited the government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations and unions.

  8. 2011 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_term_per_curiam...

    "Montana's arguments in support of the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case." Breyer filed a dissent, joined by Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, writing that he disagreed with the holding in Citizens United. Even accepting that decision, however, Breyer did not believe it ...

  9. File:Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.pdf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Citizens_United_v...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us