Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Simon states that "decision-making is the heart of the administration, and that the vocabulary of administrative theory must be derived from the logic and psychology of human choice." [7] Other public administration scholars have also argued for a tighter connection between the fields of psychology and public administration. [2] [8]
Bureaucratic agencies are often structured so that legislators and their staffers have the opportunity to easily monitor bureaucratic activity. [8] While some scholars believe that structural organization can help lessen bureaucratic drift, [9] other scholars have found that this approach can backfire. [8]
The Classical Public Administration Theory prioritizes efficiency in organizational work, professionalization, a pragmatic approach to bureaucracy, and merit-based promotions. The classical system includes a strict definition of responsibilities and objectives and control over all involved functions.
The politics-administration dichotomy is a theory that constructs the boundaries of public administration and asserts the normative relationship between elected officials and administrators in a democratic society. [1] The phrase politics-administration dichotomy was first found in public administration literature from the 1940s. [2]
Political psychology is an interdisciplinary academic field, dedicated to understanding politics, politicians and political behavior from a psychological perspective, and psychological processes using socio-political perspectives. [1]
Administrative Behavior: a Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization is a book written by Herbert A. Simon (1916–2001). It asserts that "decision-making is the heart of administration, and that the vocabulary of administrative theory must be derived from the logic and psychology of human choice", and it attempts to describe administrative organizations "in a way that ...
The Administrative State is Dwight Waldo's classic public administration text based on a dissertation written at Yale University.In the book, Waldo argues that democratic states are underpinned by professional and political bureaucracies and that scientific management and efficiency is not the core idea of government bureaucracy, but rather it is service to the public.
These included social psychology, economics, sociology, and business administration (Waldo 1984, liv). He had argued previously that the nature and boundaries of the study were problematical (Waldo 1968, 5), and he suggested that public administration ought to be pursued from a "professional perspective" (p. 9).