enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Major Crimes Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_Crimes_Act

    The Major Crimes Act (U.S. Statutes at Large, 23:385) [1] is a law passed by the United States Congress in 1885 as the final section of the Indian Appropriations Act of that year. The law places certain crimes under federal jurisdiction if they are committed by a Native American in Native territory. The law follows the 1817 General Crimes Act ...

  3. United States v. Kagama - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Kagama

    United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Major Crimes Act of 1885. [1] This Congressional act gave the federal courts jurisdiction in certain Indian-on-Indian crimes, even if they were committed on an Indian reservation.

  4. McGirt v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGirt_v._Oklahoma

    McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark [1] [2] United States Supreme Court case which held that the domain reserved for the Muscogee Nation by Congress in the 19th century has never been disestablished and constitutes Indian country for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, meaning that the State of Oklahoma has no right to prosecute American Indians for crimes allegedly ...

  5. Indian country jurisdiction - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_country_jurisdiction

    The General Crimes Act (18 U.S.C. § 1152) and the Major Crimes Act, (18 U.S.C. § 1153) encompass other crimes and determine the jurisdiction when concerning particular cases. [27] The General Crimes Act of 1817 provides for the prosecution of crimes by non-Indians against Indians and of non-major crimes by Indians against non-Indians through ...

  6. United States v. Lara - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Lara

    In response to Ex Parte Crow Dog, Congress passed the Major Crimes Act in 1885. [12] The Act provided that the federal government had exclusive jurisdiction [fn 4] over certain Indian-on-Indian crimes [fn 5] when the crimes were committed in "Indian country." [fn 6] [16] In 1886, the Act was upheld by the Supreme Court in United States v.

  7. United States v. John (1978) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._John_(1978)

    In response to Ex Parte Crow Dog, Congress passed the Major Crimes Act in 1885. [9] The Act provided that the federal government had exclusive jurisdiction [fn 4] over certain Indian on Indian crimes [fn 5] when the crimes were committed in "Indian country." [fn 6] [13] In 1886, the Act was upheld by the Supreme Court in United States v.

  8. Outline of United States federal Indian law and policy

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_United_States...

    Blood Struggle highlights major events and consequences in American Indian history since the Termination Act of 1953. Wilkinson, Charles (1991). Indian Tribes As Sovereign Governments: A Sourcebook on Federal-Tribal History, Law, and Policy .

  9. Ex parte Crow Dog - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Crow_Dog

    The case led to the Major Crimes Act in 1885, which placed some major crimes (initially seven, now 15) under federal jurisdiction if committed by an Indian against another Indian on a reservation or tribal land. This case was the beginning of the plenary power legal doctrine that has been used in Indian case law to limit tribal sovereignty.