enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from free will - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_free_will

    These arguments are deeply concerned with the implications of predestination. Noted Jewish philosopher Moses Maimonides described the conflict between divine omnipotence and his creation's person's free will, in traditional terms of good and evil actions, as follows: … "Does God know or does He not know that a certain individual will be good ...

  3. Free will in theology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_will_in_theology

    Free will in theology is an important part of the debate on free will in general. Religions vary greatly in their response to the standard argument against free will and thus might appeal to any number of responses to the paradox of free will, the claim that omniscience and free will are incompatible.

  4. Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvin_Plantinga's_free-will...

    Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense is a logical argument developed by the American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga and published in its final version in his 1977 book God, Freedom, and Evil. [1] Plantinga's argument is a defense against the logical problem of evil as formulated by the philosopher J. L. Mackie beginning in 1955.

  5. Opinion: A philosopher, after a lifetime of study, concludes ...

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-philosopher-lifetime...

    It's increasingly popular to believe that humans are merely machines and therefore can't control their behavior. But biology doesn't let us off the hook.

  6. Peter van Inwagen - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_van_Inwagen

    The Consequence Argument and the Mind Argument are the two horns in the classic dilemma and standard argument against free will. [ citation needed ] If determinism is true, our actions are not free. If indeterminism is true, our actions are influenced by randomness and our will cannot be morally responsible for them.

  7. Friedrich Nietzsche and free will - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Nietzsche_and...

    The 19th-century philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche is known as a critic of Judeo-Christian morality and religions in general. One of the arguments he raised against the truthfulness of these doctrines is that they are based upon the concept of free will, which, in his opinion, does not exist.

  8. On the Bondage of the Will - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Bondage_of_the_Will

    Despite his own criticisms of contemporary Roman Catholicism, Erasmus argued that it needed reformation from within and that Luther had gone too far.He held that all humans possessed free will and that the doctrine of predestination conflicted with the teachings and thrust [1] of the Bible, which continually calls wayward humans to repent.

  9. Defending Free Speech Is a Dirty Job But Someone’s ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/defending-free-speech-dirty-job...

    Defending Free Speech Is a Dirty Job But Someone’s Gotta Do It: Talking the First Amendment with Nico Perrino of FIRE Read More » The post Defending Free Speech I.