enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This is a list of notable patent law cases in the United States in chronological order. The cases have been decided notably by the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) or the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI). While the Federal Circuit (CAFC) sits below the Supreme Court ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court patent case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Schillinger v. United States: 155 U.S. 163: 1894: Patent infringement claim against the United States cannot be asserted. Black Diamond Coal Mining Company v. Excelsior Coal Company: 156 U.S. 611: 1895: Consolidated Electric Light Co v. McKeesport Light Co: 159 U.S. 465: 1895: Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Medart: 158 U.S. 68: 1895: Boyden ...

  4. Amgen Inc v. Sanofi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amgen_Inc_v._Sanofi

    Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, 598 U.S. 594 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Amgen's two patent applications on cholesterol-lowering drugs failed to satisfy the enablement clause of §112 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 112(a).

  5. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_and_Trademark...

    Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com B. V., 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with the trademarkability of a generic terms appended with a top-level domain (TLD) specifier (in this case "Booking.com"). The Court ruled that such names can be trademarked unless the existing combination of term and TLD is ...

  6. Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kimble_v._Marvel...

    Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC, 576 U.S. 446 (2015), is a significant decision of the United States Supreme Court for several reasons. One is that the Court turned back a considerable amount of academic criticism of both the patent misuse doctrine as developed by the Supreme Court and the particular legal principle at issue in the case.

  7. Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_University_v...

    Stanford University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., 563 U.S. 776 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that title in a patented invention vests first in the inventor, even if the inventor is a researcher at a federally funded lab subject to the 1980 Bayh–Dole Act. [1]

  8. KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KSR_International_Co._v...

    On April 30, 2007, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the judgment of the Federal Circuit, holding that the disputed claim 4 of the patent was obvious under the requirements of 35 U.S.C. §103, and that in "rejecting the District Court’s rulings, the Court of Appeals analyzed the issue in a narrow, rigid manner inconsistent with §103 and our precedents," referring to the Federal Circuit ...

  9. List of patent case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_patent_case_law

    Apple Inc. litigation (multiple, multinational cases) Apple v. HTC (US, 2010) Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (multiple, multinational cases, ongoing [citation needed]) Ariad v. Lilly (US, 2006) Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Association Inc. v. Lexmark International Inc. (US, 2005) Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad ...