enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Animal testing on non-human primates - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_testing_on_non...

    Fortrea primate-testing lab, Vienna, Virginia, 2004–05. Most of the NHPs used are one of three species of macaques, accounting for 79% of all primates used in research in the UK, and 63% of all federally funded research grants for projects using primates in the U.S. [25] Lesser numbers of marmosets, tamarins, spider monkeys, owl monkeys, vervet monkeys, squirrel monkeys, and baboons are used ...

  3. Countries banning non-human ape experimentation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countries_banning_non...

    Banning in this case refers to the enactment of formal decrees prohibiting experimentation on non-human apes, though often with exceptions for extreme scenarios. [ a ] Experimentation on great apes —a smaller family within the ape superfamily—is currently banned in the European Union , the United Kingdom , and New Zealand (29 countries ...

  4. Anti-Vivisection Coalition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Vivisection_Coalition

    The AVC attracted local media attention in 2014 for protests against primate testing.The group launched an online petition against the use of taxpayer money for the UK Government funding of primate tests, signed by thousands of people, [2] and criticised Newcastle University's Institute of Neuroscience for conducting experiments on macaques, calling for the UK Government to stop funding the ...

  5. Scientists who object to animal testing claim they are frozen ...

    www.aol.com/news/scientists-object-animal...

    A spokesperson for the UK-based Understanding Animal Research organisation was sceptical about the scientists’ claims, saying: “Those who do animal testing are also the biggest investors in ...

  6. National Anti-Vivisection Society - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Anti-Vivisection...

    The NAVS believes there are good scientific arguments against the use of animals in research, not least because of the misleading results from animal experiments, due to species differences. Thus, they argue, abolishing animal research would be in the public interest. However, to pursue such a case would be prohibitively expensive.

  7. Europe Edges Closer to Banning Animal Testing - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/animal-testing-cosmetics...

    The idea is to use non-animal, human-relevant methods, and to establish a timeline and list of milestones to be reached as animal testing is wound down. The EU Cosmetics Europe Edges Closer to ...

  8. Rise for Animals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rise_for_Animals

    The philosophy of NEAVS emphasizes that the use of animals in research, testing, and education is unscientific, as shown in numerous studies; is unnecessary due to the availability of and continuing development of alternatives that yield results superior to animal use; and that the humane and ethical arguments against the suffering and death of ...

  9. The NIH had been deleting all social media comments containing words like animal, testing, and cruel. The NIH Deleted Comments Criticizing Animal Testing. A Federal Court Says That Violates the ...