Ad
related to: prohibitory injunction relief examples in north carolina
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A "writ of prohibition", in the United States, is a court order rendered by a higher court to a judge presiding over a suit in an inferior court. The writ of prohibition mandates the inferior court to cease any action over the case because it may not fall within that inferior court's jurisdiction.
Injunctions in English law are a legal remedy of three types. Prohibitory injunctions prevent an individual or group from beginning or continuing actions which threaten or breach the legal rights of another. Mandatory injunctions are rarer and compel a person to carry out a certain act such as make restitution to an injured party.
In England and Wales, injunctions whose existence and details may not be legally reported, in addition to facts or allegations which may not be disclosed, have been issued; they have been informally dubbed "super-injunctions". [26] [27] An example was the super-injunction raised in September 2009 by Carter-Ruck solicitors on behalf of oil ...
In 1987, the Ninth Circuit, upheld an injunction against the Secretary of Labor to enforce the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act within the entire forestry industry, reasoning that "the district court has the power to order nationwide relief where it is required."
In U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina Western Division, Republican Jefferson Griffin asked for a preliminary injunction so the North Carolina State Board of Elections ...
The relief of Specific Performance is an equitable relief which is usually remedial or protective in nature. In civil law (the law of continental Europe and much of the non English speaking world), specific performance is considered to be the basic right. Money damages are a kind of "substitute specific performance."
"A nationwide injunction is appropriate in this case." That means everybody benefits from the injunction against the CTA, the reporting rule, and the January 1, 2025, deadline for compliance.
An Anton Piller order is often combined with a Mareva injunction, enabling an applicant to have the respondent's assets frozen so they cannot be dissipated to frustrate the judgment. This can, however, be disastrous for a defendant as the cumulative effect of these orders can be to destroy the whole of a business' custom, by freezing most of ...
Ad
related to: prohibitory injunction relief examples in north carolina