enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Hierarchy of hazard controls - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_hazard_controls

    The system is not based on evidence of effectiveness; rather, it relies on whether the elimination of hazards is possible. Eliminating hazards allows workers to be free from the need to recognize and protect themselves against these dangers. Substitution is given lower priority than elimination because substitutes may also present hazards.

  3. Anticipate, recognize, evaluate, control, and confirm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anticipate,_recognize...

    The anticipate, recognize, evaluate, control, and confirm (ARECC) decision-making framework began as recognize, evaluate, and control.In 1994 then-president of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Harry Ettinger added the anticipate step to formally convey the duty and opportunity of the worker protection community to proactively apply its growing body of knowledge and experience ...

  4. Occupational hygiene - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupational_hygiene

    Illustration of Exposure Risk Assessment and Management related to anticipation, recognition, evaluation, control, and confirmation. Occupational hygiene or industrial hygiene (IH) is the anticipation, recognition, evaluation, control, and confirmation (ARECC) of protection from risks associated with exposures to hazards in, or arising from, the workplace that may result in injury, illness ...

  5. Hazard substitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_substitution

    Substitution is the second most effective of the five members of the hierarchy of hazard controls in protecting workers, after elimination. [1] [2] [3] Substitution and elimination are most effective early in the design process, when they may be inexpensive and simple to implement, while for an existing process they may require major changes in ...

  6. Hazard elimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazard_elimination

    Elimination can fail as a strategy if the hazardous process or material is reintroduced at a later stage in the design or production phases. [6] The complete elimination of hazards is a major component to the philosophy of Prevention through Design, which promotes the practice of eliminating hazards at the earliest design stages of a project. [7]

  7. Ergonomic hazard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergonomic_hazard

    Elimination is the practice of removing a hazard from the work operation so there is no longer risk of harm. [9] This is the most effective solution. For ergonomic hazards, this could involve: Redesigning the work area to remove the need for prolonged reaching, bending, or maintaining awkward postures.

  8. Zaytsev's rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaytsev's_rule

    More generally, Zaytsev's rule predicts that in an elimination reaction the most substituted product will be the most stable, and therefore the most favored. The rule makes no generalizations about the stereochemistry of the newly formed alkene, but only the regiochemistry of the elimination reaction. While effective at predicting the favored ...

  9. Reductive elimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductive_elimination

    Reductive elimination generally occurs more rapidly from a more sterically hindered metal center because the steric encumbrance is alleviated upon reductive elimination. Additionally, wide ligand bite angles generally accelerate reductive elimination because the sterics force the eliminating groups closer together, which allows for more orbital ...