Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Feedback such as "nice article" is not helpful. Point out any issues with the article that need to be addressed, but also mention what the editor has done well. An example of good feedback would be "Your article is well-structured, and I'm impressed with your use of images. Well done! However, some statements in the article are biased.
You may add one of the image request templates, such as: {{photo requested}} - {{map requested}} - {{diagram requested}} - {{video requested}} or {{audio requested}} to the article's talk page. This will automatically place the article into Category:Wikipedia requested photographs. Additional templates are available at Category:Image request ...
In general, if you want to make an edit request: Propose a specific change on a talk page.Don't add an edit request template yet.; Once there is consensus for the change, and any final details have been worked out, put a template on the talk page along with a short, clear explanation.
Please help by fulfilling these requests! Help maintain the list by moving misplaced or unsorted requests to the appropriate section. Many requests can be fulfilled by creating a redirect from the requested title. Fulfilled requests should be removed from the list. Remember to categorize newly created articles, and tag them as stubs if they are ...
Where to get feedback on a newly created article: if you've just created an article and would like feedback on it, this is the page for you. First, you should not normally request feedback on an article within the first 24 hours after its creation. Most new articles are routinely vetted by volunteers within 24 hours; they will add suitable ...
This is the proposed process to request approval of specific article revisions in accordance with the policies laid out on Wikipedia:Approved article revisions.. Approved revisions are defined as specific article revisions that are considered to be fully-sourced, neutral, grammatically correct, and readable.
Requests for feedback is meant for non-controversial articles that are still far from featured status. If there is a dispute regarding the content of an article, first talk to the other users concerned on the talk page. Failing that, use the dispute resolution process. For established articles that may be improved to featured status, use Peer ...
WP:RFF is a place where feedback on articles can be requested via a peer review process. These articles may already be in the main encyclopaedia, or they may still be in draft form in user space. A requests for feedback on an article is normally submitted by its creator, although it is possible for other users to seek feedback on an article at RFF.