Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court that held that bank records are not subject to protection under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1] The case, along with Smith v. Maryland, established the principle of the third-party doctrine in relation to privacy rights.
The case was only the second case heard by eleven justices in the Supreme Court's history; the first was R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (2017), which delivered an 8–3 verdict that the royal prerogative could not be used to invoke Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union.
Case name Citation Date decided Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Ass'n, Inc. 425 U.S. 1: 1976: Middendorf v. Henry: 425 U.S. 25: 1976: Carey v.
United States v. Article Consisting of 50,000 Cardboard Boxes More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls; United States v. Dinitz; United States v. Janis; United States v. Jewell; United States v. Martinez-Fuerte; United States v. Miller (1976) United States v. Randall; United States v. Watson
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The perceptions of judicial activism derived from the number of applications for judicial review made to the courts, which led to R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland in 2019, joint landmark constitutional law cases on the limits of the power of royal prerogative to prorogue the Parliament of the United ...
Jon Keith Miller, 84, was arrested Thursday after he “confirmed his involvement” in the vicious stabbing of Mary Schlais, whose body was found at a Spring Brook intersection in February 1974.
This article in Prospect magazine calls it "the most significant judicial statement on the constitution in over 200 years". It also mentions Miller I, which I note has a significance section: "Miller & Cherry is a case that will be discussed centuries from now. It is considerably more innovative, and more significant, than the first Miller case ...