enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Martin v. Boise - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Boise

    Martin v. Boise (full case name Robert Martin, Lawrence Lee Smith, Robert Anderson, Janet F. Bell, Pamela S. Hawkes, and Basil E. Humphrey v.City of Boise) was a 2018 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding anti-camping ordinances targeting homeless people, effectively overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024.

  3. Supreme Court to weigh whether cities can punish homeless ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-weigh-whether...

    The Supreme Court in 2019, before the appointment of Justice Amy Coney Barrett created a 6-3 conservative majority, declined to take up a similar case from Idaho in which the city of Boise was ...

  4. City of Grants Pass v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Grants_Pass_v._Johnson

    Boise, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that city officials in Boise, Idaho, could not enforce an anti-camping ordinance whenever its homeless population exceeds the number of available beds in its homeless shelters. Since the Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal to this case in 2019, it became binding precedent within the ...

  5. Supreme Court ruling on homelessness leads the way for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-homelessness...

    The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Friday that will allow cities to ban public camping will bolster Florida's recent move to hold local municipalities accountable for their homeless populations.. The ...

  6. Idaho’s top court just heard arguments against a new Boise ...

    www.aol.com/idaho-top-court-just-heard-235806733...

    The Idaho Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Boise neighborhood association’s fight to stop the shelter. Idaho’s top court just heard arguments against a new Boise homeless shelter. What ...

  7. Pitts v. Black - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitts_v._Black

    The Court concluded a specific location where the homeless returns regularly and a place designated to receive mail should satisfy. [7] On 9 October 1984, the Court ruled that, by refusing the homeless to register to vote, the New York City Board of Elections was in breach of the equal protection clause under the Fourteen Amendment. [8]

  8. Supreme Court Rules That Punishing the Homeless for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rules-punishing...

    In 2022, the 9th Circuit upheld the district court's injunction, prompting Grants Pass to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Earlier this year, the court agreed to take the case.

  9. How a small city in Oregon could shape the way major U.S ...

    www.aol.com/news/one-small-oregon-citys-rules...

    The Grants Pass case arrived at the Supreme Court after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the city’s homeless residents. The appeals court ruled 2-1 that the city, which is about ...