Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This comparison of programming languages compares how object-oriented programming languages such as C++, Java, Smalltalk, Object Pascal, Perl, Python, and others manipulate data structures. Object construction and destruction
Python: Application, general, web, scripting, artificial intelligence, scientific computing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Aspect-oriented De facto standard via Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs) R: Application, statistics Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes No Racket: Education, general, scripting Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Modular, logic, meta No Raku
OCaml (/ oʊ ˈ k æ m əl / oh-KAM-əl, formerly Objective Caml) is a general-purpose, high-level, multi-paradigm programming language which extends the Caml dialect of ML with object-oriented features. OCaml was created in 1996 by Xavier Leroy, Jérôme Vouillon, [5] Damien Doligez, Didier Rémy, [6] Ascánder Suárez, and others.
Python. The use of the triple-quotes to comment-out lines of source, does not actually form a comment. [19] The enclosed text becomes a string literal, which Python usually ignores (except when it is the first statement in the body of a module, class or function; see docstring). Elixir
The 1D Haar wavelet transform of an integer-power-of-two-length list of numbers can be implemented very succinctly in Caml and is an excellent example of the use of pattern matching over lists, taking pairs of elements (h1 and h2) off the front and storing their sums and differences on the lists s and d, respectively:
In OCaml, it is defined by the standard library as type (' a, ' b) ... In Python, it is available from third party libraries such as returns and result. Rust
F# is a member of the ML language family and originated as a .NET Framework implementation of a core of the programming language OCaml. [5] [6] It has also been influenced by C#, Python, Haskell, [4] Scala and Erlang.
Only a few object-oriented languages actually allow this (for example, Python when typechecked with mypy). C++, Java and most other languages that support overloading and/or shadowing would interpret this as a method with an overloaded or shadowed name. However, Sather supported both covariance and contravariance.