enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rational root theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_root_theorem

    In the polynomial + the only possible rational roots would have a numerator that divides 6 and a denominator that divides 1, limiting the possibilities to ±1, ±2, ±3, and ±6. Of these, 1, 2, and –3 equate the polynomial to zero, and hence are its rational roots (in fact these are its only roots since a cubic polynomial has only three roots).

  3. Partial fraction decomposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_fraction_decomposition

    Suppose Q(x) = (x − α) r S(x) and S(α) ≠ 0, that is α is a root of Q(x) of multiplicity r. In the partial fraction decomposition, the r first powers of ( x − α ) will occur as denominators of the partial fractions (possibly with a zero numerator).

  4. Descartes' rule of signs - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes'_rule_of_signs

    [2] [3] In the 1970s Askold Khovanskii developed the theory of fewnomials that generalises Descartes' rule. [4] The rule of signs can be thought of as stating that the number of real roots of a polynomial is dependent on the polynomial's complexity, and that this complexity is proportional to the number of monomials it has, not its degree.

  5. Fundamental theorem of algebra - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of_algebra

    Even without using complex numbers, it is possible to show that a real-valued polynomial p(x): p(0) ≠ 0 of degree n > 2 can always be divided by some quadratic polynomial with real coefficients. [11] In other words, for some real-valued a and b, the coefficients of the linear remainder on dividing p(x) by x 2 − ax − b simultaneously ...

  6. Quartic equation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartic_equation

    In either case the full quartic can then be divided by the factor (x − 1) or (x + 1) respectively yielding a new cubic polynomial, which can be solved to find the quartic's other roots. If a 1 = a 0 k , {\displaystyle \ a_{1}=a_{0}k\ ,} a 2 = 0 {\displaystyle \ a_{2}=0\ } and a 4 = a 3 k , {\displaystyle \ a_{4}=a_{3}k\ ,} then x = − k ...

  7. Factorization of polynomials over finite fields - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factorization_of...

    The polynomial P = x 4 + 1 is irreducible over Q but not over any finite field. On any field extension of F 2, P = (x + 1) 4. On every other finite field, at least one of −1, 2 and −2 is a square, because the product of two non-squares is a square and so we have; If =, then = (+) ().

  8. Minimal polynomial (linear algebra) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_polynomial_(linear...

    T 3 ⋅ e 1 = −4T 2 ⋅ e 1 − T ⋅ e 1 + e 1, so that: μ T, e 1 = X 3 + 4X 2 + X − I. This is in fact also the minimal polynomial μ T and the characteristic polynomial χ T : indeed μ T, e 1 divides μ T which divides χ T, and since the first and last are of degree 3 and all are monic, they must all

  9. Multiplicative inverse - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_inverse

    For the multiplicative inverse of a real number, divide 1 by the number. For example, the reciprocal of 5 is one fifth (1/5 or 0.2), and the reciprocal of 0.25 is 1 divided by 0.25, or 4. The reciprocal function, the function f(x) that maps x to 1/x, is one of the simplest examples of a function which is its own inverse (an involution).