enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Working Time Directive 2003 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Time_Directive_2003

    Article 3 – there must be a daily rest of eleven consecutive hours per 24-hour period. Article 4 – a rest period for every six hours, set by legislation or collective agreement. Article 5 – weekly rest of 24 hours uninterrupted, on top of the daily rest in article 3, but derogation is justifiable for technical, organizational, or work ...

  3. Working Time Regulations 1998 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_Time_Regulations_1998

    The Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) is a statutory instrument in UK labour law which implemented the EU Working Time Directive 2003. [1] It was updated in 1999, but these amendments were then withdrawn in 2006 [2] following a legal challenge in the European Court of Justice. [3] It does not extend to Northern Ireland.

  4. Working time in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_time_in_the_United...

    Working time in the United Kingdom is regulated in UK labour law in respect of holidays, daily breaks, night work and the maximum working day under the Working Time Regulations 1998. While the traditional mechanisms for ensuring a "fair day's wage for a fair day's work" is by collective agreement , since 1962 the UK created minimum statutory ...

  5. R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Department_of_Trade...

    The European Court of Justice said the Directive's purpose from recitals 1, 4, 7 and 8 and Art 1(1) is ‘to improve the living and working conditions of workers’. Recital 4 refers to the Community Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers point 8 and 19(1) that everyone should have satisfactory health and safety at work. It is ...

  6. Commission v United Kingdom (C-484/04) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commission_v_United...

    Working Time Directive Commission v United Kingdom (2006) C-484/04 is a European labour law and UK labour law case concerning the Working Time Directive , which is relevant for the Working Time Regulations 1998 .

  7. Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Jaeger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landeshauptstadt_Kiel_v_Jaeger

    The 1994 Act was found to breach the Directive by allowing Dr. Jaeger's collective agreement to only offset active on-call time. Under Article 17, a derogation to allow for a reduction of the daily minimum rest of 8 hours could only be granted if an immediate rest period followed, and such a reduction could not permit the maximum weekly working ...

  8. Pfeiffer v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pfeiffer_v_Deutsches_Rotes...

    Since they are exceptions to the Community system for the organisation of working time put in place by Directive 93/104, the exclusions from the scope of the directive provided for in Article 1(3) must be interpreted in such a way that their scope is limited to what is strictly necessary in order to safeguard the interests which the exclusions ...

  9. European labour law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_labour_law

    The European Social Charter 1961 art 2(1) requires "the working week to be progressively reduced" with "increase of productivity". [10] The Working Time Directive 2003 requires at least four paid weeks of holiday a year. [11] With two-day weekends, most people in the EU work two-thirds of the year or less. [12]