enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

  3. Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_Justice_and_Court...

    On sentencing, the act formally removes the role of the Home Secretary in sentencing of young people for grave crimes (such as murder) following the decisions by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Dept ex parte Venables and Thompson (1997) [5] and the subsequent case at the European Court of Human Rights, T. v United Kingdom.

  4. List of judgements of the House of Lords - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_judgements_of_the...

    These are lists of cases heard before the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords until it was replaced by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in October 2009. List of judgements of the House of Lords delivered before 1996; List of judgements of the House of Lords delivered in 1996; List of judgements of the House of Lords delivered in 1997

  5. R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Daly)_v_Secretary_of...

    R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26 is a UK constitutional law case of the House of Lords case on the rights of a prisoner when his cell is searched by prison officers.

  6. R (on the application of SG and others) v Secretary of State ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(on_the_application_of...

    R (on the application of SG and others) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was a 2015 judgment by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom where by a majority of 3–2 the court ruled that the benefit cap, a British government policy limiting welfare benefits, was legal. [1]

  7. R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The case, R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, went to the Divisional Court, where it was heard by judges Richard Gibbs and John Laws. [13] Bancoult's argument was made on several grounds: firstly, that the Crown could not exclude a British citizen from British territory, except in times of war, without a ...

  8. R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(HS2_Action_Alliance_Ltd...

    The Supreme Court held that the UK has constitutional instruments that the courts would not interpret to be abrogated without close scrutiny. [2] Lord Reed observed that the scrutiny of the legislative process required by the EU directive may amount to an impingement "upon long-established constitutional principles governing the relationship between Parliament and the courts" [3] including the

  9. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [1993] UKHL 8, [1994] 1 AC 531 was an important UK constitutional law case concerning applications for judicial review. Facts [ edit ]