enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

3. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union [1995] UKHL 3 is a House of Lords case concerning the awarding of compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. The case is considered significant in constitutional terms for its ruling on the extent of ministerial prerogative powers.

4. R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Daly)_v_Secretary_of...

   R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] UKHL 26 is a UK constitutional law case of the House of Lords case on the rights of a prisoner when his cell is searched by prison officers.

5. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

   R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts

6. A v Secretary of State for the Home Department - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 56 (also known as the Belmarsh 9 case) is a UK human rights case heard before the House of Lords.It held that the indefinite detention of foreign prisoners in Belmarsh without trial under section 23 of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

7. R (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Factortame_Ltd)_v...

   The Law Reports: R v Secretary of State for Transport ex parte Factortame Ltd (No. 2) [1991] 1 AC 603; Factortame II. bailii.org: ECJ's 2nd ruling, 25 July 1991; 2nd ECJ decision, official version at eur-lex; Factortame III. ECJ's 3rd ruling, 5 March 1996; Factortame IV. Divisional Court, 31 July 1997; Court of Appeal, 8 April 1998; House of ...

8. 12 Ways to Wear Dresses With Boots This Fall - AOL

   www.aol.com/lifestyle/12-ways-wear-dresses-boots...

   Below, I’ve rounded up the 12 best dresses to wear with boots right now. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us. Sign in ...

9. R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ...

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

   The standard requirement for legitimate expectation, as decided in R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan, was that there must be a "clear and unambiguous" promise made that led to a reliance or a detriment; Robin Cook's statement after the first Bancoult case could not be described as a clear and unambiguous promise of ...