enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unfair dismissal in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_dismissal_in_the...

    Assuming the employee has proven dismissal, the first stage is to establish what was the reason for dismissal, e.g. was it a potentially fair reason or an automatically unfair reason. [3] The burden of proof for this is on the employer. [4] If the employer pleads a potentially fair reason, the burden is on him to prove it. [5]

  3. Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_of_Undertakings...

    But, in those circumstances their only option is to "object" which in essence is a resignation but does not impose a duty on the employer to pay notice pay. As their role continues (with the new employer) they are not redundant and therefore have no entitlement to redundancy pay and cannot (except in limited circumstances) claim unfair dismissal.

  4. Redfearn v United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redfearn_v_United_Kingdom

    50 In the opinion of the Court, a claim for unfair dismissal under the 1996 Act would be an appropriate domestic remedy for a person dismissed on account of his political beliefs or affiliations. Once such a claim is lodged with the Employment Tribunal, it falls to the employer to demonstrate that there was a "substantial reason" for the dismissal.

  5. Four steps to challenge an unfair redundancy or problem at work

    www.aol.com/news/four-steps-to-challenge-an...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Redundancy in United Kingdom law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundancy_in_United...

    Section 139 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 defines the two situations in which a redundancy may occur: (a) the fact that his employer has ceased or intends to cease— (i) to carry on the business for the purposes of which the employee was employed by him, or (ii) to carry on that business in the place where the employee was so employed, or

  7. Abernethy v Mott, Hay and Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abernethy_v_Mott,_Hay_and...

    The employer can only rely on the reason in fact for which he dismissed the man, if the facts are sufficiently known or made known to the man. The reason in this case was — on the facts — already known or sufficiently made known to Mr. Abernethy. The wrong label of 'redundancy' does not affect the point.

  8. Social Security Fairness Act could restore benefits, but ...

    www.aol.com/social-security-fairness-act-could...

    "Critics say there is a reason why we force people to pay into the Social Security system. These are two separate systems. If we need to fix Social Security, let's fix it. Let's not just do a ...

  9. Employment Rights Act 1996 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Rights_Act_1996

    The reasons laid out that an employer can dismiss are in s.98(2). Fair reasons to dismiss an employee are if it, (a) relates to the capability or qualifications of the employee for performing work of the kind which he or she was employed by the employer to do, (b) relates to the conduct of the employee, (c) is that the employee was redundant, or