enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  3. Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_Amendment_to...

    The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments.Usually considered one of the most consequential amendments, it addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law and was proposed in response to issues related to formerly enslaved Americans following the American Civil War.

  4. City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Richmond_v._J.A...

    City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the minority set-aside program of Richmond, Virginia, which gave preference to minority business enterprises (MBE) in the awarding of municipal contracts, was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. The Court found ...

  5. The Supreme Court shows how 'minority rule' is a problem in ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-shows-minority...

    "The really problematic contemporary force here, in my view, is the Republican party," Sheri Berman, a democracy expert at Barnard College, told Insider

  6. Comcast v. National Association of African-American-Owned ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast_v._National...

    Comcast claimed that the lawsuit was "an ordinary business grievance masquerading as a racial discrimination claim". [ 4 ] Around the time of this filing, Comcast was in the midst of trying to acquire Time Warner , and Time Warner had been named in Allen's suit, [ 3 ] but by April 2015, Comcast called off its acquisition.

  7. Plessy v. Ferguson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 20 January 2025. 1896 U.S. Supreme Court case on racial segregation 1896 United States Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court of the United States Argued April 13, 1896 Decided May 18, 1896 Full case name Homer A. Plessy v. John H. Ferguson Citations 163 U.S. 537 (more) 16 S. Ct. 1138; 41 L ...

  8. Thornburg v. Gingles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornburg_v._Gingles

    Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a unanimous Court found that "the legacy of official discrimination ... acted in concert with the multimember districting scheme to impair the ability of "cohesive groups of black voters to participate equally in the political process and to elect candidates of their choice."

  9. Miller v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._Johnson

    Miller v. Johnson , 515 U.S. 900 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning "affirmative gerrymandering /racial gerrymandering", where racial minority-majority electoral districts are created during redistricting to increase minority Congressional representation.