Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within a certain discipline. [1] [2] A review article is generally considered a secondary source since it may analyze and discuss the method and conclusions in previously published studies.
Expert Review of Medical Devices is a monthly peer-reviewed medical journal covering research on the clinical use of devices. It was established in 2004 and is published by Informa . According to the Journal Citation Reports , the journal has a 2013 impact factor of 1.784.
Semantic Scholar is a research tool for scientific literature powered by artificial intelligence.It is developed at the Allen Institute for AI and was publicly released in November 2015. [2]
A review is a detailed analysis of recent developments on a topic. A commentary is a short summary of an author's personal experience. Editorials are short reviews or critiques of original articles. Letters to the editor are communications directed to the editor of an article to ask questions and provide constructive criticism.
SAGE Publications, which also accepted a fake paper, was put "under review" for 6 months. [19] Sage announced in a statement that it was reviewing the journal that accepted the fake paper, but that it would not shut it down. [20] Sage's membership was reinstated at the end of the review period following changes to the journal's editorial ...
Every week for the duration of the 2024 NFL regular season, USA TODAY Sports will provide timely updates to the league's ever-evolving playoff picture − starting after Sunday afternoon's late ...
This is a list of the articles with the most references on Wikipedia.. Reference count updates and the inclusion of articles are done manually and reflect the information as of the date indicated for the respective article.
In a review of Meyer's article The origin of biological information and the higher taxonomic categories, Alan Gishlick, Nick Matzke, and Wesley R. Elsberry claimed it contained poor scholarship, that it failed to cite and specifically rebut the actual data supporting evolution, and "constructed a rhetorical edifice out of omission of relevant ...