enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argumentation scheme - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_scheme

    As in this example, argumentation schemes typically recognize a variety of semantic (or substantive) relations that inference rules in classical logic ignore. [2]: 19 More than one argumentation scheme may apply to the same argument; in this example, the more complex abductive argumentation scheme may also apply.

  3. Argumentation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentation_theory

    Two men argue at a political protest in New York City. Example of an early argument map, from Richard Whately's Elements of Logic (1852 edition). Argumentation theory is the interdisciplinary study of how conclusions can be supported or undermined by premises through logical reasoning.

  4. Douglas N. Walton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_N._Walton

    The schemes connect arguments together into sequences, often called chaining, by taking the conclusion of one argument as a premise in a subsequent argument. Some common schemes are argument from goal-based reasoning, argument from negative consequences, argument from positive consequences, inference to the best explanation (abductive reasoning ...

  5. Argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

    Argumentation schemes have been developed to describe and assess the acceptability or the fallaciousness of defeasible arguments. Argumentation schemes are stereotypical patterns of inference, combining semantic-ontological relations with types of reasoning and logical axioms and representing the abstract structure of the most common types of ...

  6. Practical reason - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Practical_reason

    Argument from values is combined with practical reasoning in the type of argumentation called value-based practical reasoning. [ 3 ] [ 4 ] [ 5 ] The following argumentation scheme for value-based practical reasoning is given in Atkinson, Bench-Capon & McBurney (2005 , pp. 2–3).

  7. Pragma-dialectics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma-dialectics

    The pragma-dialectical theory has been applied to understand several different types of argumentative discourse. For example, it has been used to analyze and evaluate legal argumentation, mediation, negotiation, (parliamentary) debate, interpersonal argumentation, political argumentation, health communication and visual argumentation. [10]

  8. The Subsidy Gap - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects/ncaa/...

    Another way to view the divide between rich and poor college sports programs is to compare the 50 universities most reliant on subsidies to the 50 colleges least reliant on that money. The programs that depend heavily on student fees, institutional support and taxpayer dollars have seen a jump in income in the past five years — and also a ...

  9. Inventio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inventio

    Inventio, one of the five canons of rhetoric, is the method used for the discovery of arguments in Western rhetoric and comes from the Latin word, meaning "invention" or "discovery". Inventio is the central, indispensable canon of rhetoric, and traditionally means a systematic search for arguments .