Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2015, the company spun off its stationery division, via a management buyout. The new company retained the North Adams factory, as well as Crane & Co. and related trademarks. [7] In 2018, Mohawk Fine Papers purchased Crane Stationery. Mohawk is a family-owned company headquartered in Cohoes, New York. [8]
This page was last edited on 25 September 2017, at 22:24 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
The company adopted the name Mohawk Carpet Mills (or Mohawk Mills, for short) in 1920, when it merged with McCleary, Wallin and Crouse, another mill in Amsterdam. [11] It became the country's sole weaver to offer an entire line of domestic carpets, also creating the industry's first textured design and sculptured weave.
DC Thomson & Co Ltd v Deakin [1952] Ch 646 is a UK labour law case, concerning the right to strike. Facts ... It got TGWU drivers to disrupt its supply of paper.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Modern Transport Company, Limited v Duneric Steamship Company [1916] 1 KB 726: King's Bench Division 1916: Palace Shipping Company, Limited v Gans Steamship Line [1916] 1 KB 138: King's Bench Division 1916: Scottish Navigation Company, Limited v W.A. Souter & Co. [1916] 1 KB 675: King's Bench Division 1916: The King v Sheffield Justices Ex ...
Thompson & Ors v Arnold [2007] EWHC 1875 (QB), was a law on damages case where the existing case law (Read v Great Eastern Railway (1868) LR 3 QB 555) [4] reaffirmed that damages awarded for a claim for personal injury were deemed to have already been awarded, even if death ensued as a consequence of personal injury. [5]
McLaren Maycroft & Co v Fletcher Development Co Ltd; McLaren Transport Ltd v Somerville; McMahon v Gilberd and Co Ltd; Meates v Attorney-General; Mechenex Pacific Services Ltd v TCA Airconditioning (New Zealand) Ltd; Midland Metals Overseas Pte Ltd v The Christchurch Press Co Ltd; Mills v United Building Soc; Moffat v Moffat; Moreton v Montrose ...