Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
At the heart of the civil suit, filed in Fulton County, are two items the election board passed this month: the reasonable inquiry rule and the examination rule.
However, a revocation has no effect until it is actually communicated to the person to whom the original offer was made [per Lush J at 352] relying upon the American decisions in Tayloe v Merchant's Fire Insurance Co How. Sup. Court Rep. 390 and Byrne & Co v Leon Van Tienhoven & Co 49 L.L. (C.P.) [316]. As P had not received D's telegram of ...
Once issues concerning the producibility of a requested statement have been raised, it is the duty of the court to conduct some sort of inquiry. This is a question for the court, and not the jury. [79] [80] A trial court's decision of what material must be produced under the Act is subject to review under the "clearly erroneous" standard. [81]
Because the need for minimum contacts is a matter of personal jurisdiction (the power of the court to hear the claim with respect to a particular party) instead of subject matter jurisdiction (the power of the court to hear this kind of claim at all), a party can explicitly or implicitly waive their right to object to the court hearing the case.
J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro, 564 U.S. 873 (2011), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that a court may not exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that has not purposefully availed itself of doing business in the jurisdiction or placed goods in the stream of commerce in the expectation they would be purchased in the jurisdiction.
The U.S. criminal case accusing Donald Trump of illegally trying to overturn his 2020 election defeat resumed after a nearly eight-month pause on Friday, with the judge left to decide how to ...
Rule 50 addresses situations in which a case is so one-sided that the court may grant "judgment as a matter of law" taking the case from the jury. Rule 51 governs jury instructions. Rule 52 provides procedure for the judge to hand down findings and conclusions following non-jury trials.
Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009), is a United States labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on unlawful discrimination through disparate impact under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.