enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Murder of Kitty Genovese - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Kitty_Genovese

    The incident prompted inquiries into what became known as the bystander effect, or "Genovese syndrome", [6] and the murder became a staple of U.S. psychology textbooks for the next four decades. Researchers have since uncovered major inaccuracies in the Times article, and police interviews revealed that some witnesses had attempted to contact ...

  3. Hofling hospital experiment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hofling_hospital_experiment

    The experimental protocol was explained to a group of twelve nurses and twenty-one nursing students, who were asked to predict how many nurses would give the drug to the patient; ten nurses and all the nursing students said they would not do it. Hofling then selected 22 nurses at a hospital in the United States for the actual experiment.

  4. Karen Ann Quinlan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Ann_Quinlan

    Quinlan's case continues to raise important questions in moral theology, bioethics, euthanasia, legal guardianship and civil rights. Her case has affected the practice of medicine and law around the world. A significant outcome of her case was the development of formal ethics committees in hospitals, nursing homes and hospices. [1]

  5. Bystander effect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effect

    The bystander effect, or bystander apathy, is a social psychological theory that states that individuals are less likely to offer help to a victim in the presence of other people. The theory was first proposed in 1964 after the murder of Kitty Genovese , in which a newspaper had reported (albeit erroneously) that 38 bystanders saw or heard the ...

  6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient. The original 1974 decision mandated warning the threatened ...

  7. Thing v. La Chusa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_v._La_Chusa

    La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson , and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial ...

  8. List of psychological effects - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_psychological_effects

    Baader–Meinhof effect; Barnum effect; Bezold effect; Birthday-number effect; Boomerang effect; Bouba/kiki effect; Bystander effect; Cheerleader effect; Cinderella effect; Cocktail party effect; Contrast effect; Coolidge effect; Crespi effect; Cross-race effect; Curse of knowledge; Diderot effect; Dunning–Kruger effect; Einstellung effect ...

  9. Xu Shoulan v. Peng Yu - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xu_Shoulan_v._Peng_Yu

    Xu Shoulan v. Peng Yu, also referred to as the Peng Yu case [1] or the Nanjing Peng Yu Incident, [2] was a civil lawsuit in the People's Republic of China, brought before the Nanjing District Court in 2007. In 2006, Peng Yu had encountered Xu Shoulan after she had fallen, breaking her femur. Peng assisted Xu and brought her to a local hospital ...