Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Sky Zone is a Provo, Utah–based company that operates indoor trampoline parks.The company is often erroneously credited with opening the first indoor trampoline park in 2004 (although it was not the first), [1] and is controversial for the number of injuries that have occurred in its parks.
Courts may refuse to enforce a general liability waiver if it fails to inform the signer of the specific risk that caused the injury. [2] Liability waivers include pre-accident releases and model releases (for pictures). Reckless or intentional actions can never be disclaimed and liability resulting from a faulty product cannot be waived in the ...
Apr. 3—SALEM, N.H. — Contrary to the business' name, Fun City trampoline park has earned a reputation for violence and juvenile arrests in the five months since opening. Records show that the ...
CircusTrix was an American developer, operator and franchisor of indoor trampoline and extreme recreation parks. [1] [2] The company operates over 319 parks [3] [4] in the United States, Europe, and Asia [5] making it the largest trampoline park operator in the world, [6] [7] the largest operator of extreme obstacle courses in the United States, [8] and the operator of the largest trampoline ...
The chain was launched by Drew Wilson and Marc Collopy in 2010 with the opening of a trampoline park in Dublin, California. The California park was announced in 2011 and opened a second facility in 2012.
This is a summary of notable incidents that have taken place at various independently owned amusement parks, water parks or theme parks.This list is not intended to be a comprehensive list of every such event, but only those that have a significant impact on the parks or park operations, or are otherwise significantly newsworthy.
A waiver is the voluntary relinquishment or surrender of some known right or privilege. Regulatory agencies of state departments or the federal government may issue waivers to exempt companies from certain regulations. For example, a United States law restricted the size of banks, but when banks exceeded these sizes, they obtained waivers. [1]
Class action waivers lack a uniform policy across Canada, as the Supreme Court of Canada has found that provincial legislation governs disputes. Nationally, though, in Seidel v. TELUS Communications, the court found that because a class action waiver was attached to an invalid arbitration agreement, the class action waiver was void.