Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The amount of ridiculous laws that still exist on the books in this day and age is mind-boggling. While sometimes we wonder why people don't just roll up their sleeves and get to removing these ...
Strange laws, also called weird laws, dumb laws, futile laws, unusual laws, unnecessary laws, legal oddities, or legal curiosities, are laws that are perceived to be useless, humorous or obsolete, or are no longer applicable (in regard to current culture or modern law). A number of books and websites purport to list dumb laws.
From Alabama to Wyoming, some of the most ridiculous laws in the US can cost you a lot of money.
An island city-state famous for cleanliness, Singapore has many laws aimed at keeping the nation tidy. The country seems to have a particular obsession with chewing gum, banning its importation ...
An important aspect of absurdism is that the absurd is not limited to particular situations but encompasses life as a whole. [2] [1] [13] There is a general agreement that people are often confronted with absurd situations in everyday life. [7] They often arise when there is a serious mismatch between one's intentions and reality. [2]
Unenumerated rights may become enumerated rights when certainty is needed, such as in federal nations where laws of subordinate states may conflict with federal laws. [1] The term "unenumerated rights" may be used loosely to mean any unstated natural rights and legal rights or the intrinsic human rights of an individual. [1]
Uncommon Laws. The United States tax code is anything but simple. The instructions for the standard 1040 tax form alone are more than 100 pages long, and good luck getting through them in one sitting.
Poe's law is based on a comment written by Nathan Poe in 2005 on christianforums.com, an Internet forum on Christianity. The message was posted during a debate on creationism, where a previous poster had remarked to another user: "Good thing you included the winky. Otherwise people might think you are serious". [4] The reply by Nathan Poe read: [1]