enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Printz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Printz_v._United_States

    The Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), Pub. L 90-618 and subsequent amendments established a detailed Federal program governing the distribution of firearms. The GCA prohibited firearms ownership by certain broad categories of individuals thought to pose a threat to public safety: convicted felons, convicted misdemeanor domestic violence or stalking offenders, persons with an outstanding felony ...

  3. Michael R. Murphy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_R._Murphy

    After law school, he clerked for Judge David Thomas Lewis of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit from 1972 to 1973. Upon completion of his clerkship, he entered private practice in Salt Lake City, Utah with Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough.

  4. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcia_v._San_Antonio...

    Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985), is a landmark United States Supreme Court [1] decision in which the Court held that the Congress has the power under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to extend the Fair Labor Standards Act, which requires that employers provide minimum wage and overtime pay to their employees, to state and local governments. [2]

  5. Category:United States Tenth Amendment case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    This category is for court cases in the United States dealing with the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Pages in category "United States Tenth Amendment case law" The following 20 pages are in this category, out of 20 total.

  6. Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspen_Skiing_Co._v._Aspen...

    The 10th Circuit refused to hear Ski Co.'s appeal of the relevant market instruction because they failed to properly object during the trial. [38] Ski Co. argued that the relevant market should be decided by the judge as a matter of law (applying the Small, but Significant and Non-Transitory Increase in Price or SSNIP test ), not the jury.

  7. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  8. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_v._South_Carolina...

    He wrote, "The case should have been dismissed as improperly granted, as the decision of the trial court that a total taking had occurred is highly questionable on the basis of the facts presented" because "The petition for review was granted on the assumption that the state [of South Carolina], by regulation, had deprived the owner of his ...

  9. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals rejects KKG case for lack of ...

    www.aol.com/10th-circuit-court-appeals-rejects...

    CHEYENNE — The appealed case of six University of Wyoming sorority sisters against their parent organization, Kappa Kappa Gamma, was rejected Wednesday for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by ...